Mini - Studies
— 116 —
EG, 2010
+ 0800.00 f6h3
p
Hoe alle torens in de hoek rechts-
onderaan zijn gesukkeld is mij een
raadsel. Maar wit wint hier met
gelijk materiaal:
Zetten
| 1. | ||
| 2. | ||
| 3. | ||
| 4. | ||
| 5. | ||
| 6. |
1.Tc2+ Kd1 2.Td2+ Ke1 3.Te2+
een onnodige omweg. (Zie zet 4.)
En mat.
In EG n° 182 melde redacteur Ed
van de Gevel over studie -197- dit:
“Becker reacted to the 0800.00
study of Ignace Vandecasteele in
the previous ‘Originals’ columm:
Ignace Vandecasteele’s study
EG 181.17213 has a lot of com-
plexity that isn’t revealed in the
main line. I wondered why the
composer chose to place the wK
on f6. White still wins with the wK
on the seemingly weaker squares
f7 and f8. Curiously, these other
placements of the wK create du-
als. Ignace found the only dual-free
setting for this idea of chasing the
bK up the board to h8 and then
back to h6 for the mate.
One of the duals I looked at in-
volved a longer chase before the
bK is driven to the corner. I loo--
ked for a way to turn this dual into
a new version of the study. See the
result below. How did those chess-
men end up in the corner? Ignace
put them there! I shifted the wK to
extend the play, and added pawns
to eliminate all duals. (...and of
course, I rotated the board 90 de-
grees.)”
Waarop Ed van de Gevel in Origi-
nals colomn (30) reageerde met:
“Since Belgium is not know as an
earthquake prone country I am
sure Richard’s solution to the
question how the chessmen all
ended up in the corner is the right
one. Regarding Ignace’s study I
can add that Ignace initially en-
tered a study with a longer king
hunt which unfortunately had a
dual. He decided to keep the stu-
dy an aristocrat. Richards study
shows the result when you ac--
cept to add pawns to keep the lon-
ger king hunt.”
Kh3 Ta2 Tb2 / Kc1 Ta1 Tb2 d5 g5 +
Kf1 4.Tf2+ Kg1 5.Tg2+ Kf1 6.Taf2+
Ke1 7.Te2+ (7.Kh2 is korter)
Kf1 14. Th1+ en mat.
Dus nevenoplosbaar. En waarom
dan die twee zwarte ‘duds” ?
Zie volgende studie: